Cerni, T., Di Benedetto, A great., & Rumiati, Roentgen. I. (2021). The newest sum away from identity and you can intelligence on the cognitive competences from inside the large training. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 2566.
Damian, R. We., Spengler, M., Sutu, A., & Roberts, B. W. (2019). 16 going on 60-six: An excellent longitudinal examination of character balances and change all over 50 years. Diary of Character and you can Social Therapy, 117(3), 674.
Daurio, A good. M., & Taylor, J. (2022). A study of triarchic brand of psychopathy and you may worry about-reported Cluster B identity infection traits. Identity Disorders: Concept, Research, and Procedures, 13(2), 153.
Furnham, An effective., & Monsen, J. (2009). Characteristics and cleverness expect informative college levels. Learning and you can private variations, 19(1), 28-33.
Haider, Z. F., & von Stumm, S. (2022). Anticipating informative and you may societal–emotional effects in the emerging adulthood of cleverness, identity, and you will socioeconomic condition. Journal of Character and you can Personal Therapy.
Holland, A. S., & Roisman, G. I. (2008). Large Four character traits and you can dating top quality: Self-said, observational, and you will physiological research. Log of Personal and private Matchmaking, 25(5), 811-829.
Holley, P., Yabiku, S., & Benin, Meters. (2006). The partnership between intelligence and you will divorce. Log of Relatives Items, 27(12), 1723-1748.
Hong-Hua, Y., Wen-Qing, F., & Shu-Qiao, Y. (2006). Symptomatology out-of Team-B Personality Disorders in the Five-Factor Design Angle. Chinese Mental health Log.
Kassenboehmer, S. C., Leung, F., & Schurer, S. (2018). University training and low-cognitive ability invention. Oxford Economic Documentation, 70(2), 538-562.
Lyngstad, T. H. (2004). This new effect away from parents’ and you will spouses’ studies to the split up prices from inside the Norway. Demographic look, ten, 121-142.
Mathes, Age. W., Brennan, S. Meters., Haugen, P. Meters., & Rice, H. B. (1985). Evaluations from actual elegance as a purpose of ages. The newest Journal from Public Therapy, 125(2), 157-168.
Mate worth get refuse (or not), although it does perhaps not appear to be a shield to relationship formation
McGue, Meters., Anderson, Age. L., Willoughby, Age., Giannelis, A good., Iacono, W. Grams., & Lee, J. J. (2022). Not of the g by yourself: The advantages of a degree one of people with lower levels from standard intellectual feature. Intelligence, 92, 101642.
Meier, B. P., Robinson, M. D., Carter, M. S., & Hinsz, V. B. (2010). Is actually social people far more beautiful? A no-friend data off agreeableness, extraversion, and you will elegance. Log off Browse within the Personality, 44(2), 293-296.
Nieuwenhuis, J. (2018). This new telecommunications anywhere between college or university poverty and you may agreeableness for the forecasting instructional attainment. Personality and you will Private Variations, 127, 85-88.
Standard traits regarding personality and affectivity due to the fact predictors out of satisfaction during the intimate relationships: Research off self?and you will partner?reviews
Tatarunaite, E., Playle, R., Hood, K., Shaw, W., & Richmond, S. (2005). Facial appeal: a great longitudinal study. Western Journal off Orthodontics and you femmes normales Pakistanais can Dentofacial Orthopedics, 127(6), 676-682.
Sarah Flooding, Miriam Queen, Renae Rodgers, Steven Ruggles, J. Robert Warren and you may Michael Westberry. Integrated Public Have fun with Microdata Show, Latest Population Survey: Type ten.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS, 2022.
Scott, S. B., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. Meters., Allen, E. S., & ). Reasons for having divorce or separation and you will recollections out of premarital intervention: Ramifications having improving dating education. Few and you will Family relations Psychology: Look and exercise, 2(2), 131.
Solomon, B. C., & Jackson, J. J. (2014). Exactly why do characteristics assume split up? Several routes thanks to satisfaction. Record from Identity and you can Societal Psychology, 106(6), 978.
Vernon, P. A., Villani, V. C., Vickers, L. C., & Harris, J. A beneficial. (2008). A behavioral hereditary data of your own Ebony Triad therefore the Larger 5. Identification and you will personal Distinctions, 44(2), 445-452.
Widiger, T. Good., Sellbom, Yards., Chmielewski, M., Clark, L. A great., DeYoung, C. Grams., Kotov, R., … & Wright, A great. G. (2019). Identification inside a beneficial hierarchical model of psychopathology. Health-related Psychological Science, 7(1), 77-ninety five.
The modern CPS study you should never tell you if for example the threat of divorce case was additive. Interactions you certainly will indicate blended marriages features large otherwise all the way down risks than simply the entire dangers of two individuals. But not, earlier in the day lookup towards breakup and you may studies demonstrates it is (Lyngstad, 2004). The fresh splitting up risk for 2 PhD owners is about 15%, consistent with the private chance of 7-8% having personal PhD people.
Buss, D. M., Goetz, C., Duntley, J. D., Asao, K., & Conroy-Beam, D. (2017). The newest companion changing hypothesis. Identification and you can Personal Differences, 104, 143-149.